There was an article today in the NYTimes about a revolutionary new format which the Democrats running for president will use in their next debate: YouTube video questions.
The concept is that us regular folks will submit our questions to the candidates to YouTube. CNN will select from the submissions, show them to the candidates on the stage and get their reactions, answers to questions, etc.
While this does provide (on the surface) an unprecedented level of access to the prospective candidates, I think the true fireworks will happen after the debate. My prediction is that the aftermath of the YouTube debate will rival the Digg Revolt and scare the bejeebus out of people in power. What’s the Digg Revlot? Glad you asked…
The Digg Revolt
- Google results for “Digg Revolt”
- Wikipedia article on it
- Forbes Online Article
Digg.com is a socially networked news aggregator: visitors provide links and descriptions to blog posts, videos, and online articles. Other visitors then give the submission either a thumbs -up (dugg) or down (bury). Each submission gets a score, with the most ‘dugg’ articles ending up on the main page for all to see.
A couple of months ago, an article was dugg up to the main page included the decryption code for pre-recorded HD-DVD movies. This is a string of numbers, letters and hyphens which an HD-DVD player needs in order to unlock the movie on the disc. This code is readily visible using non-subversive techniques and in-fact had been discovered well before the Digg Revolt. The consortium of companies which own the HD-DVD format sent Digg a cease and desist order citing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and demanded that the offending articles be removed.
Digg moderators then removed the article only to see another submission with the same code appear shortly thereafter on the main page. Moderators moved quickly to remove that article as well, but by then the damage had been done.
The Digg community began submitting articles and blog posts about the code by the thousands. Moderators were quickly overwhelmed and soon the entire front page of Digg included nothing but links to the code. The site was then shut-down for several hours. During the shutdown, Digg founder Kevin Rose wrote in his blog:
“…after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you’ve made it clear. You’d rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won’t delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be.”
The YouTube Revolt (date TBD) :
So what does that have to do with Democratic Presidential debate?
Invariably, videos will be made which the candidates object to. Either it shows them in an unfavorable light, talks about a subject they don’t want to discuss, or otherwise gets rejected.
These videos will still be seen, one way or another, and the reaction to THAT is what will help sway my vote in the weeks after the televised YouTube debate.
YouTube is governed by the same principles as Digg: users create YouTube’s content and without the users YouTube is just an online video player with nothing to show. If the censoring of user-created videos for the candidates is mishandled, the offended parties will be posting their gripes on YouTube. And if that is mishandled, YouTube will face the same tug of war with their beloved users as Digg.
I think this is a Good Thing™ in that, the candidate that survives the onslaught will (hopefully) be well and truly fit to lead.
Thus is the word of our Rob… amen.